東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Comparison of hearing threshold esti...

Squires, Rebekah Lynn.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals./
Author:	Squires, Rebekah Lynn.
Description:	190 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3033.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-06B.
Subject:	Health Sciences, Audiology. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178379
ISBN:	9780542178849

Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals.
Squires, Rebekah Lynn.

Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals. - 190 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3033.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--James Madison University, 2005.

This study examined the threshold finding diagnostic testing procedures of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) to the traditional behavioral audiometric procedure used for pure tone air conduction threshold audiometry testing. The hypothesis underlying this study is that the Auditory Steady State Response thresholds will be a closer estimate of hearing threshold than ABR for individuals with hearing loss and the ABR will prove to be a better testing procedure for individuals with normal hearing or mild hearing losses. Twenty adult participants were used for this study, 10 individuals with normal hearing and 10 individuals with a moderate to profound high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Each participant had an Audiogram (frequencies 250--8000 Hz), ABR (frequencies 500 & 4000 Hz), & ASSR (frequencies 500 & 4000 Hz) run for 1 ear. These 3 tests were then repeated using a special tube to simulate a conductive loss. Statistical significance was found for all conditions with the exception of the comparison of the pure tone air conduction audiogram and the tone burst ABR at 4000 Hz for the normal hearing group and the hearing impaired group using the conductive tube, as well as this same comparison for the hearing impaired group using the normal tube. Positive correlations were found between pure tone air conduction behavioral scores, ABR scores, and ASSR scores for all participants across the hearing range show a trend that supports the hypothesis despite finding statistical significance.

ISBN: 9780542178849Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018138
Health Sciences, Audiology.

Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals.
LDR:02448nmm 2200265 4500 001 1820175
005 20061011104229.5
008 130610s2005 eng d
020 $a 9780542178849
035 $a (UnM)AAI3178379
035 $a AAI3178379
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Squires, Rebekah Lynn. $3 1909413
245 1 0 $a Comparison of hearing threshold estimates by tone burst-ABR and ASSR in normal and hearing impaired individuals.
300 $a 190 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-06, Section: B, page: 3033.
500 $a Adviser: Roger Ruth.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--James Madison University, 2005.
520 $a This study examined the threshold finding diagnostic testing procedures of Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) to the traditional behavioral audiometric procedure used for pure tone air conduction threshold audiometry testing. The hypothesis underlying this study is that the Auditory Steady State Response thresholds will be a closer estimate of hearing threshold than ABR for individuals with hearing loss and the ABR will prove to be a better testing procedure for individuals with normal hearing or mild hearing losses. Twenty adult participants were used for this study, 10 individuals with normal hearing and 10 individuals with a moderate to profound high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Each participant had an Audiogram (frequencies 250--8000 Hz), ABR (frequencies 500 & 4000 Hz), & ASSR (frequencies 500 & 4000 Hz) run for 1 ear. These 3 tests were then repeated using a special tube to simulate a conductive loss. Statistical significance was found for all conditions with the exception of the comparison of the pure tone air conduction audiogram and the tone burst ABR at 4000 Hz for the normal hearing group and the hearing impaired group using the conductive tube, as well as this same comparison for the hearing impaired group using the normal tube. Positive correlations were found between pure tone air conduction behavioral scores, ABR scores, and ASSR scores for all participants across the hearing range show a trend that supports the hypothesis despite finding statistical significance.
590 $a School code: 1357.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Audiology. $3 1018138
690 $a 0300
710 2 0 $a James Madison University. $3 1023976
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-06B.
790 1 0 $a Ruth, Roger, $e advisor
790 $a 1357
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3178379