東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Sport psychology strategies, types o...

Tubilleja, Kenneth.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes./
Author:	Tubilleja, Kenneth.
Description:	163 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: B, page: 4272.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-08B.
Subject:	Psychology, Behavioral. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3142923
ISBN:	0496006819

Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes.
Tubilleja, Kenneth.

Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes. - 163 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: B, page: 4272.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--West Virginia University, 2003.

The present study examined differences between levels of adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation (SIRAS; Brewer, Van Raalte, Petitpas, Sklar, & Ditmar, 1995) among injured student-athletes on their use of sport psychology strategies (TOPS; Thomas, Murphy, & Hardy, 1999) and their perceived social support (SSS-C; Richman, Rosenfeld, & Hardy, 1993). Relationships between adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation and sport psychology strategies and perceived social support were also investigated. In addition, participants' use and training in sport psychology strategies was explored. The sample consisted of 35 student-athletes from 1 NCAA Division I and 3 Division II institutions who sustained athletic injuries that required them to receive treatment at an athletic training room for at least ten sessions or two weeks. Participants attended an average of 42 sessions. Injuries ranged from ankle sprains to ACL tears. Participants represented 9 sports with a balanced number of female (n = 19) and male (n = 16) student-athletes. No significant differences were found between low and high groups on adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation on TOPS Competition scores for self-talk, goal setting, imagery, and relaxation; and the following SSS-C types of social support: Listening, emotional, emotional challenge, reality confirmation, task appreciation, and task challenge. No significant positive relationships were found between SIRAS scores and scores for sport psychology strategies and types of social support. A greater proportion of participants were found to use several sport psychology skills in both competition and rehabilitation, but not to have received formal training in these skills. No differences in proportion of participants were found to use these skills because of differences in SIRAS level, gender, class-status, or severity of injury. Additional analyses revealed significant differences between NCAA Division I and II participants with Division II student-athletes scoring higher on TOPS Competition scores for self-talk, goal setting, and relaxation. The results of this study are discussed and explained. Implications for interventions addressing injured student-athletes' sport psychological and social support needs are provided. Limitations of this study are shared and directions for future research are offered.

ISBN: 0496006819Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017677
Psychology, Behavioral.

Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes.
LDR:03293nmm 2200277 4500 001 1811496
005 20061010094934.5
008 130610s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496006819
035 $a (UnM)AAI3142923
035 $a AAI3142923
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Tubilleja, Kenneth. $3 1901068
245 1 0 $a Sport psychology strategies, types of social support, and adherence to injury rehabilitation among university student-athletes.
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-08, Section: B, page: 4272.
500 $a Chair: Roy H. Tunick.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--West Virginia University, 2003.
520 $a The present study examined differences between levels of adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation (SIRAS; Brewer, Van Raalte, Petitpas, Sklar, & Ditmar, 1995) among injured student-athletes on their use of sport psychology strategies (TOPS; Thomas, Murphy, & Hardy, 1999) and their perceived social support (SSS-C; Richman, Rosenfeld, & Hardy, 1993). Relationships between adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation and sport psychology strategies and perceived social support were also investigated. In addition, participants' use and training in sport psychology strategies was explored. The sample consisted of 35 student-athletes from 1 NCAA Division I and 3 Division II institutions who sustained athletic injuries that required them to receive treatment at an athletic training room for at least ten sessions or two weeks. Participants attended an average of 42 sessions. Injuries ranged from ankle sprains to ACL tears. Participants represented 9 sports with a balanced number of female (n = 19) and male (n = 16) student-athletes. No significant differences were found between low and high groups on adherence to athletic injury rehabilitation on TOPS Competition scores for self-talk, goal setting, imagery, and relaxation; and the following SSS-C types of social support: Listening, emotional, emotional challenge, reality confirmation, task appreciation, and task challenge. No significant positive relationships were found between SIRAS scores and scores for sport psychology strategies and types of social support. A greater proportion of participants were found to use several sport psychology skills in both competition and rehabilitation, but not to have received formal training in these skills. No differences in proportion of participants were found to use these skills because of differences in SIRAS level, gender, class-status, or severity of injury. Additional analyses revealed significant differences between NCAA Division I and II participants with Division II student-athletes scoring higher on TOPS Competition scores for self-talk, goal setting, and relaxation. The results of this study are discussed and explained. Implications for interventions addressing injured student-athletes' sport psychological and social support needs are provided. Limitations of this study are shared and directions for future research are offered.
590 $a School code: 0256.
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Psychology, Physiological. $3 1017869
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0989
710 2 0 $a West Virginia University. $3 1017532
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-08B.
790 1 0 $a Tunick, Roy H., $e advisor
790 $a 0256
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3142923