東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Cervical cancer screening barriers a...

Hill, Erin Michelle.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs.

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs./
Author:	Hill, Erin Michelle.
Description:	121 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 3209.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International48-05.
Subject:	Psychology, Behavioral. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR58444
ISBN:	9780494584446

Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs.
Hill, Erin Michelle.

Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs. - 121 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 3209.

Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2009.

A female undergraduate sample (N =259) was used to investigate the influence of attachment, personality, and health beliefs on prospective cervical cancer screening choices and screening barriers. Two choices of cervical cancer screening were investigated: the Pap test, and a novel screening method, HPV-DNA self-sampling, a method under development in Ontario which would allow women to collect their own samples. Conscientiousness and perceived barriers to self-sampling were found to be predictive of Pap test choice, and perceived Pap test barriers were predictive of self-sampling choice. Conscientiousness emerged as the strongest predictor of screening barriers; it was inversely predictive of both Pap test and self-sampling barriers. Attachment anxiety was found to be predictive of both Pap test barriers and self-sampling barriers. Perceived susceptibility and perceived benefits were inversely predictive of Pap test barriers. Extraversion and openness were inversely predictive of self-sampling barriers. Implications of understanding psychological factors involved in cervical screening are discussed.

ISBN: 9780494584446Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017677
Psychology, Behavioral.

Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs.
LDR:01972nam 2200265 4500 001 1405819
005 20111214135017.5
008 130515s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780494584446
035 $a (UMI)AAIMR58444
035 $a AAIMR58444
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Hill, Erin Michelle. $3 1685237
245 1 0 $a Cervical cancer screening barriers and prospective method choices: The influence of attachment, personality and health beliefs.
300 $a 121 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 48-05, page: 3209.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University (Canada), 2009.
520 $a A female undergraduate sample (N =259) was used to investigate the influence of attachment, personality, and health beliefs on prospective cervical cancer screening choices and screening barriers. Two choices of cervical cancer screening were investigated: the Pap test, and a novel screening method, HPV-DNA self-sampling, a method under development in Ontario which would allow women to collect their own samples. Conscientiousness and perceived barriers to self-sampling were found to be predictive of Pap test choice, and perceived Pap test barriers were predictive of self-sampling choice. Conscientiousness emerged as the strongest predictor of screening barriers; it was inversely predictive of both Pap test and self-sampling barriers. Attachment anxiety was found to be predictive of both Pap test barriers and self-sampling barriers. Perceived susceptibility and perceived benefits were inversely predictive of Pap test barriers. Extraversion and openness were inversely predictive of self-sampling barriers. Implications of understanding psychological factors involved in cervical screening are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0040.
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a Carleton University (Canada). $3 1018407
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 48-05.
790 $a 0040
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2009
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MR58444