東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back to Search results for [ null ]

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Exploring the relationship between s...

Masciocchi, Christopher Michael.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one?

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one?/
Author:	Masciocchi, Christopher Michael.
Description:	169 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: B, page: 3955.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-06B.
Subject:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3403820
ISBN:	9781109776843

Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one?
Masciocchi, Christopher Michael.

Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one? - 169 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: B, page: 3955.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2010.

Attention is associated with benefit and cost due to competition for limited capacity resources involved in access for awareness. Spatial cues guide spatial attention producing benefit for attended stimuli and cost for unattended stimuli. Semantic relatedness shows a similar pattern: primes produce benefit for related and cost for unrelated stimuli, suggesting they work through semantic attention. An unanswered question is how semantic and spatial attention interact: Does the benefit and cost for related stimuli occur because they attract spatial attention? Three accounts of the relationship between semantic and spatial attention were examined: Semantic attention (a) works through spatial attention, (b) delays disengagement of spatial attention, and (c) is independent of spatial attention. In Experiments 1 to 3, participants performed a visual search task for a prime target in a word display and/or a probe discrimination task on a probe target. Experiments 1a and 1b showed that the word and probe tasks were suitable for examining semantic and spatial attention, respectively. Experiments 2a and 2b showed that in the absence of explicit influences on spatial attention, related distractors led to higher word search task accuracy on target present and lower accuracy on target absent trials. Importantly, related distractors did not attract spatial attention as measured by probe task performance, although they did slow responses on target absent trials. Experiment 3 showed that related distractors also do not attract spatial attention when an abrupt onset spatial cue is presented. Instead, spatial attention was slower to disengage from related versus unrelated distractors on target absent trials. Experiments 4 and 5 examined spatial and semantic attention using the temporal order judgment paradigm in which participants judged which of two stimuli occurred first (or second). Related words and abrupt onset spatial cues had different effects on performance: Relatedness did not influence judgments, but cued words were judged as occurring first more often than uncued words. Taken together, these results suggest that semantic and spatial attention reflect different processes that affect access to awareness. Semantic relatedness does not attract spatial attention, but there is a delay in disengaging spatial attention from related stimuli.

ISBN: 9781109776843Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one?
LDR:03463nam 2200313 4500 001 1401071
005 20111013150241.5
008 130515s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109776843
035 $a (UMI)AAI3403820
035 $a AAI3403820
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Masciocchi, Christopher Michael. $3 1272603
245 1 0 $a Exploring the relationship between spatial and semantic attention: Two limited capacity systems or one?
300 $a 169 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-06, Section: B, page: 3955.
500 $a Adviser: Veronica J. Dark.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Iowa State University, 2010.
520 $a Attention is associated with benefit and cost due to competition for limited capacity resources involved in access for awareness. Spatial cues guide spatial attention producing benefit for attended stimuli and cost for unattended stimuli. Semantic relatedness shows a similar pattern: primes produce benefit for related and cost for unrelated stimuli, suggesting they work through semantic attention. An unanswered question is how semantic and spatial attention interact: Does the benefit and cost for related stimuli occur because they attract spatial attention? Three accounts of the relationship between semantic and spatial attention were examined: Semantic attention (a) works through spatial attention, (b) delays disengagement of spatial attention, and (c) is independent of spatial attention. In Experiments 1 to 3, participants performed a visual search task for a prime target in a word display and/or a probe discrimination task on a probe target. Experiments 1a and 1b showed that the word and probe tasks were suitable for examining semantic and spatial attention, respectively. Experiments 2a and 2b showed that in the absence of explicit influences on spatial attention, related distractors led to higher word search task accuracy on target present and lower accuracy on target absent trials. Importantly, related distractors did not attract spatial attention as measured by probe task performance, although they did slow responses on target absent trials. Experiment 3 showed that related distractors also do not attract spatial attention when an abrupt onset spatial cue is presented. Instead, spatial attention was slower to disengage from related versus unrelated distractors on target absent trials. Experiments 4 and 5 examined spatial and semantic attention using the temporal order judgment paradigm in which participants judged which of two stimuli occurred first (or second). Related words and abrupt onset spatial cues had different effects on performance: Relatedness did not influence judgments, but cued words were judged as occurring first more often than uncued words. Taken together, these results suggest that semantic and spatial attention reflect different processes that affect access to awareness. Semantic relatedness does not attract spatial attention, but there is a delay in disengaging spatial attention from related stimuli.
590 $a School code: 0097.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b Psychology. $3 1022617
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-06B.
790 1 0 $a Dark, Veronica J., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a West, Robert $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Cooper, Eric E. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Morris, Alison L. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Robinson, William $e committee member
790 $a 0097
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3403820