東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

IP accidents = negligence liability ...

Goold, Patrick Russell.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

IP accidents = negligence liability in intellectual property /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	IP accidents/ Patrick R. Goold.
其他題名:	negligence liability in intellectual property /
作者:	Goold, Patrick Russell.
出版者:	Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY :Cambridge University Press, : 2022.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 133 p. :digital ;25 cm.
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Jan 2022).
內容註:	Introduction -- Accidents -- History -- Efficiency and Equity -- Fairness -- Negligence -- Conclusion (on property, tort, and IP).
標題:	Intellectual property infringement - Law and legislation. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882576
ISBN:	9781108882576

IP accidents = negligence liability in intellectual property /
Goold, Patrick Russell.

IP accidentsnegligence liability in intellectual property /[electronic resource] :Patrick R. Goold. - Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY :Cambridge University Press,2022. - xvi, 133 p. :digital ;25 cm. - Cambridge intellectual property and information law. - Cambridge intellectual property and information law..

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Jan 2022).

Introduction -- Accidents -- History -- Efficiency and Equity -- Fairness -- Negligence -- Conclusion (on property, tort, and IP).

In the twenty-first century, it has become easy to break IP law accidentally. The challenges presented by orphan works, independent invention or IP trolls are merely examples of a much more fundamental problem: IP accidents. This book argues that IP law ought to govern accidental infringement much like tort law governs other types of accidents. In particular, the accidental infringer ought to be liable in IP law only when their conduct was negligent. The current strict liability approach to IP infringement was appropriate in the nineteenth century, when IP accidents were far less frequent. But in the Information Age, where accidents are increasingly common, efficiency, equity, and fairness support the reform of IP to a negligence regime. Patrick R. Goold provides the most coherent explanation of how property and tort interact within the field of IP, contributing to a clearer understanding of property and tort law and private law generally.

ISBN: 9781108882576Subjects--Topical Terms:

3792481
Intellectual property infringement
--Law and legislation.

LC Class. No.: K1401 / .G66 2022

Dewey Class. No.: 346.048

IP accidents = negligence liability in intellectual property /
LDR:02066nmm a2200289 a 4500 001 2415215
003 UkCbUP
005 20220204055205.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260207s2022 enk o 1 0 eng d
020 $a 9781108882576 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781108841481 $q (hardback)
020 $a 9781108794879 $q (paperback)
035 $a CR9781108882576
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $c UkCbUP $d GP
041 0 $a eng
050 0 0 $a K1401 $b .G66 2022
082 0 0 $a 346.048 $2 23
090 $a K1401 $b .G659 2022
100 1 $a Goold, Patrick Russell. $3 3792480
245 1 0 $a IP accidents $h [electronic resource] : $b negligence liability in intellectual property / $c Patrick R. Goold.
260 $a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2022.
300 $a xvi, 133 p. : $b digital ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Cambridge intellectual property and information law
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Jan 2022).
505 0 $a Introduction -- Accidents -- History -- Efficiency and Equity -- Fairness -- Negligence -- Conclusion (on property, tort, and IP).
520 $a In the twenty-first century, it has become easy to break IP law accidentally. The challenges presented by orphan works, independent invention or IP trolls are merely examples of a much more fundamental problem: IP accidents. This book argues that IP law ought to govern accidental infringement much like tort law governs other types of accidents. In particular, the accidental infringer ought to be liable in IP law only when their conduct was negligent. The current strict liability approach to IP infringement was appropriate in the nineteenth century, when IP accidents were far less frequent. But in the Information Age, where accidents are increasingly common, efficiency, equity, and fairness support the reform of IP to a negligence regime. Patrick R. Goold provides the most coherent explanation of how property and tort interact within the field of IP, contributing to a clearer understanding of property and tort law and private law generally.
650 0 $a Intellectual property infringement $x Law and legislation. $3 3792481
650 0 $a Negligence. $3 1090089
650 0 $a Strict liability. $3 1090165
830 0 $a Cambridge intellectual property and information law. $3 1060408
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108882576